NASA says Artemis I Needs More Reassessment After Officials Pushed Back Launch Date due to Issues

The Artemis I might not accomplish its quest as aimed following a second problem that the NASA launch team ran into last Saturday.

Future missions for the vessel are planned for September and October. However, with the new conditions casting doubt on the team, the aforementioned schedules may be delayed. According to NASA, the delays could range from a few days to a few weeks, depending on the launch team’s evaluation of Artemis I.

“We will not be launching in this launch period. We are not where we wanted to be,” said the associate administrator from the Exploration Systems Development Mission Doctorate at NASA, Jim Free.

The vessel, comprised of the Orion spacecraft and the Space Launch System rocket, must be carried to and inspected by the Vehicle Assembly Building before it can be cleared for its next expedition.

The administrator of NASA, Bill Nelson, said that the scrubs the team met do not entail Artemis I is a failure. He told the press that Artemis had already been evaluated and reviewed by the Vehicle Assembly Building 20 times before its timed liftoff.

“We do not launch until we think it’s right,” Nelson asserted. “These teams have labored over that, and that is the conclusion they came to. I look at this as part of our space program, in which safety is the top of the list.”

Read Also: The Magic of Swimming: a Mental Relief from Stress, Anxiety


The scrub the Artemis team encountered

Three hours before its planned launch last Saturday, Artemis I received a message for scrub from the members. According to the members, there was a liquid hydrogen leak within the vessel’s system. The team then investigated and spent time resolving the problem.

Liquid hydrogen is required for takeoff because it is one of the propellants in the rocket’s large core. Despite a few troubleshooting attempts by the team, the leak within the Artemis I system deterred the vessel from taking off.

A small leak discovered in the same area prior to the Saturday takeoff was also found, but the one discovered on the day of the launch was much larger. Based on the initial diagnosis, the soft seal of the liquid hydrogen connection might have been affected due to overpressurization. However, the team stated that more assessments are necessary to make sure that everything is considered.


More issues for the team

Before the launch, Artemis mission manager Mike Sarafin had to guarantee that everything was in order. As a result, the takeoff was delayed several times because of different problems that surfaced. The hydrogen leak was just one of many issues that the Artemis team had to deal with.

Issues with the rocket’s cooling system, enduring leaks, and other side issues were causes for the postponement. Because of these challenges, Artemis I had already been suspended twice. NASA said that the larger leak on Saturday compelled the group to “close the valve used to fill and drain it, then increase pressure on a ground transfer line using helium to try to reseal it.”

Despite efforts to stop the leak, it reoccurred, triggering the Artemis team to rescind the liftoff. Melody Lovin, the weather officer, also noted a 60% possibility of favorable weather conditions.

Read Also: Biden Announced Government Will Pour Billions to Wastewater Rehabilitation in Rural Areas


Artemis and its intended objective

Because a successful launch would open up the possibility for more ambitious manned missions to Mars and the moon, NASA has been gearing up for this mission for a long time.

“As we embark on the first Artemis test flight, we recall this agency’s l storied past, but our eyes are focused not on the immediate future but out there,” stated Nelson.

“It’s a future where NASA will land the first woman and the first person of color on the l moon. And on these increasingly complex l missions, astronauts will live and work in l deep space, and we’ll develop the science and technology to send the first humans to Mars.”

Source: CNN


This article features branded content from a third party. Opinions in this article do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of CEO Weekly.