Skip to main content

CEO Weekly

Dr. Luigi A. Pecoraro on How to Build Learning Agility in High-Potential Professionals

Dr. Luigi A. Pecoraro on How to Build Learning Agility in High-Potential Professionals
Photo Courtesy: Dr. Luigi A. Pecoraro

By: Natalie Johnson

High performance can open the door to leadership, but it does not necessarily determine who is ready to walk through it. For Dr. Luigi A. Pecoraro, Co-Founder of Performance Paradox Advisory, the distinction is central to understanding why some high-potential professionals advance while others become stuck despite a strong record of results.

“Performance earns credibility, learning agility determines trajectory,” Pecoraro says. This idea sits at the heart of the Performance Paradox™, his framework for understanding the gap between performance and promotion. Organizations reward what people have already demonstrated, but leadership readiness depends on whether they can continue learning as the role, strategy, and environment change.

Why Performance Is Not Enough

A high performer often succeeds by becoming exceptionally good at something. That expertise creates credibility and can make someone indispensable in their current role. The challenge comes when the next level requires a different way of thinking, influencing, and leading.

Pecoraro describes learning agility as the ability to use experience without becoming trapped by it. Faced with an unfamiliar problem, a learning-agile leader does not rush to prove they already have the answer. Instead, they slow down enough to understand what is different, map what is known and unknown, seek perspectives that challenge their assumptions, and test possible solutions.

“The learning agile person will say I will use what I know without becoming trapped by it,” he says. This is particularly important when organizations assess leadership potential. The signals that determine leadership readiness are not always visible in traditional performance measures. A professional may consistently deliver excellent results, while failing to demonstrate the adaptability, judgment, and influence required for broader responsibility.

Stretch Assignments Build More Than Experience

One of the fastest ways to develop learning agility is through a consequential, unfamiliar, cross-functional stretch assignment. Pecoraro emphasizes that the assignment must involve real work and real consequences, rather than functioning as a simulation or classroom exercise.

A turnaround, acquisition integration, new capability launch, or enterprise problem involving multiple business units can expose a high-potential professional to incomplete information, competing stakeholders, and unfamiliar decisions. Those conditions force leaders to operate beyond technical expertise and develop broader judgment.

“Experience doesn’t automatically produce learning,” Pecoraro says. “Processed experience is what really produces the learning.” That processing requires feedback and disciplined reflection throughout the assignment. Leaders need to ask what worked, what failed, what they misunderstood, and what they will do differently. Without that reflection, a difficult assignment can create what Pecoraro calls “scar tissue” rather than better judgment.

Expanding Strengths Without Losing Them

Learning agility also requires high performers to reconsider the strengths that helped them succeed. A brilliant problem solver may have built a reputation for having the answer, but leadership at a higher level may require framing the right problem and asking better questions. A decisive operator may need to shift from controlling execution to creating ownership among others. Someone known for exceptionally high standards may need to move from correcting people to coaching them.

The goal is not to abandon the strength. It is to “protect the strength but pivot how it’s used.” That shift is particularly important for promotion readiness because advancement often requires leaders to make more possible through others. Pecoraro encourages leaders to test one new behavior in a real setting, seek feedback, and compare the results. Over time, those experiments can expand a leader’s repertoire without undermining the confidence that made them successful.

Leadership Development Without the Next Rung

As organizations flatten and traditional promotion paths become less predictable, leadership development cannot depend entirely on moving vertically through titles. Pecoraro argues that organizations should think about development multidirectionally. Lateral assignments, rotations, acting roles, customer immersion, crisis simulations, and executive-sponsored projects can all create opportunities to develop leadership readiness.

He often frames these opportunities as 90-day enterprise missions. The objective is not simply to complete a project, but to examine how the experience changes the leader’s thinking, decision-making, collaboration, and response to uncertainty. “You can flatten the organizational chart without flattening leadership development,” Pecoraro says. This approach also reframes succession planning. Rather than asking only who has performed best in the current role, organizations can ask who has demonstrated the capacity to keep learning, adapting, and helping others navigate unfamiliar challenges.

From Learning Quickly to Helping Others Learn

For high-potential talent, the next stage of development is making learning visible and useful to others. Pecoraro calls this “discipline sensemaking,” which involves learning in public, changing course when evidence warrants it, turning insight into action, and sharing what has been learned. A high-potential professional can practice this by taking on one strategically important unfamiliar issue each quarter, gathering perspectives beyond their normal function, testing a hypothesis, seeking feedback, and explaining how their thinking changed.

Over time, that practice builds more than adaptability. It develops purpose, personal power, and executive presence, including the composure and credibility to lead through uncertainty. The future leadership pipeline should not be built solely around today’s strongest performers. It should identify people who can grow as the environment changes and help their teams grow with them. The question is whether they can “keep becoming the leader that the future requires.”

Follow Dr. Luigi A. Pecoraro on LinkedIn for insights on learning agility, leadership readiness, and developing high-potential talent.

Spread the love

This article features branded content from a third party. Opinions in this article do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of CEO Weekly.